Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This study aims to show findings of Pierre Bourdieu's reception in Mexico, for this, it was analyzed 8 editions of the Education Research National Congress in Mexico from 2003 to 2017, through the analysis of the citations and references included in the papers where the author appeared. This study used methodological tools such as content analysis and descriptive statistics to examine the citations and references included in the papers. The results were obtained indicate that French sociologist is the most referenced author, so it was possible to recognize the role by the citation and the referenced works to consider the popularity of the author, in the same way, it was possible to recover some indications about the reception of Bourdieu in Mexico when reading the author through others, either translators or broadcasters. Finally, the study concludes that the quotation can be understood as a measure of consecration, as a condition for academic writing, as a measuring unit, as evaluation criteria, as something that is truly worth fighting for, and as cultural capital.
References
APA. (2010). Manual de Publicaciones de la American Psychological Association. Manual Moderno.
Baranger, D. (2008). The Reception of Bourdieu in Latin America and Argentina. Sociologica, Italian journal of sociology, 2. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/27724
Baranger, D. (2011). Antropología social y sociología argentinas: Identidades disciplinares en cuatro congresos. Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales, 1(2), 23-59. https://www.relmecs.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/v01n02a03
Baranger, D. (2013). La obra de Pierre Bourdieu y su recepción en Latinoamérica. En Á. Moreno, & J. E. Ramírez. Pierre Bourdieu. Proyección Siglo XXI (pp. 157-194). Instituto Latinoamericano de Altos Estudios; Ambassade de France en Colombie.
Bikbov, A. (2009). A Strange Defeat: The Reception of Pierre Bourdieu’s Works in Russia. Sociologica, Italian journal of sociology, 2. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/31371
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Intelectuales, política y poder. Eudeba
Bourdieu, P. (2012). Los usos sociales de la ciencia. Nueva Visión
Bourdieu, P. (2015). El sentido social del gusto. Siglo XXI
Castro, R., & Suárez, H. (2018). Introducción: trabajar con Pierre Bourdieu. En R. Castro, & H. Suárez, Pierre Bourdieu en la Sociología Latinoamericana. El uso de Campo y habitus en la investigación (pp. 11-24). UNAM.
Catani, A., Catani, D., & Gilson, R. (2005). Pierre Bourdieu: las lecturas de su obra en el campo educativo brasileño. Fundamentos en Humanidades, 6(12), 195-222. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/184/18412611.pdf
Chen, N., & Zang, X. (2009). Bourdieu and Chinese Sociology. Sociologica, Italian journal of sociology, 1. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/29570
COMIE. (2017). Numeralia del Congreso. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 22(75), 1323-1330. http://www.comie.org.mx/revista/v2018/rmie/index.php/nrmie/article/view/45
COMIE. (2019). Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa A.C. COMIE. http://www.comie.org.mx/v5/sitio/historia/
Filho, F. A. (2009). The Renovation: Aspects of Pierre Bourdieu’s Reception in Brazil. Sociologica, Italian journal of sociology, 1. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/29574
Gelernter, L., & Silber, I. F. (2009). Bourdieu’s Reception in Israeli Sociology. The Fragmented Imprint of a Grand Theory. Sociologica, Italian journal of sociology, 1. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/29572
Gemperle, M. (2009). The Double Character of the German ’Bourdieu’. On the Twofold Use of Pierre Bourdieu’s Work in the German-speaking Social Sciences. Sociologica, Italian journal of sociology, 2. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/29573
Martínez, A. T. (2007). Lecturas y lectores de Bourdieu en la Argentina. Prismas - Revista de Historia Intelectual, 11(1), 11-30. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3870/387036796001.pdf
Mauger, G. (2002). Sobre algunos obstáculos sociales a la comprensión de la obra de Pierre Bourdieu. In L. E. Alonso, E. Martín-Criado, & J. L. Moreno, Pierre Bourdieu, las herramientas del sociólogo (pp. 283-297). Editorial Fundamentos.
Mauger, G. (2007). Resistencias a la sociología de Pierre Bourdieu. In P. Champagne, L. Pinto, & G. Sapiro, Pierre Bourdieu sociólogo (pp. 262-290). Nueva Visión
Moyano, E. I. (2001, mayo 2-5). Una clasificación de géneros científicos. Perspectivas Recientes sobre el discurso. [Presentación de ponencia] XIX Congreso AESLA, España. https://cutt.ly/JYRzHF8
Sapiro, G. (2016). La sociología de la literatura. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Sapiro, G. (2017). Las condiciones de producción y circulación de bienes simbólicos. Instituto Mora.
Sapiro, G., & Bustamante, M. (2009). Translation as a Measure of International Consecration. Mapping the World Distribution of Bourdieu’s Books in Translation. Sociologica, Italian journal of sociology, 1. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/31374
Sorá, G. (2003). Traducir el Brasil. Una Antropología de la circulación internacional de ideas. Zorzal.
Woodward, I., & Emmison, M. (2009). The Intellectual Reception of Bourdieu in Australian Social Sciences and Humanities. Sociologica, Italian journal of sociology, 1. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/31370
Zavisca, J., & Sallaz, J. (2008). From the Margins to the Mainstream. The Curious Convergence of Pierre Bourdieu and US Sociology. Sociologica, Italian journal of sociology, 2. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/27721
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Sandra Saraí Dimas Márquez