Abstract
This article analyzes the ethical dilemmas arising from the digital exposure of private life on social media, from an ethical-communicational perspective. This research seeks to understand how people from two different generations, Gen X and Gen Z, LIVING IN Quito, navigate ethical challenges tied sharing personal life online. To achieve this, a structured survey was applied to a stratified sample, addressing three main variables: strategic management of personal image, ethical awareness of digital consequences, nan emotional self-expression online. The findings reveal that, although both groups face similar ethical dilemmas, they respond in diverse ways: Generation X tends to regulate their exposure more reflectively, while Generation Z operates through an emotional and adaptive logic. The study concludes that digital exposure is not a uniform practice, but rather a communicative construction shaped by ethical decisions (with emotional and identity components), all included by the technological and cultural frameworks particular to each generation. These exposure patterns not only respond to generational differences but also reveal complex ethical decisions about what to show, why, and to whom, positioning communicational ethics as a fundamental axis for inhabiting the digital environment with greater awareness.
References
Bauman, Z. (2007). Vida líquida. Fondo de cultura Económica
Barlund, D. C. (1970). A transactional model of communication. En K. K. Sereno, & C. D. Mortensen, (eds.). Foundations of communication theory (pp. 83-102). Harper & Row
Boateng, K., & Boakye, K. (2020). Digital identity management on social media: Exploring the factors that influence personal information disclosure on social media. Sustainability, 12(23), 9994 https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239994
Case, A. (2016). We are all cyborgs now (conference TED). https://n9.cl/1tjt8
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Alianza editorial.
Eco, U. (1977). Tratado de semiótica general. Lumen. https://n9.cl/w3mff5
Fundación ChildFund, UNICEF y Ministerio del Ecuador. (2023). Protocolo de actuación frene a situaciones de violencia a digital detectadas en el Sistema Nacional de Educación
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC). (2023). Estadísticas de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación.
Liuzzi, A. (2016). Narrativas digitales e identidades conectadas.
López Talavera, M.D.M. L. (2016). Ética en los medios de comunicación: prensa, radio, tv y cine. McGraw-Hill
Papaioannou, T., Tsohou, A., & Karyda, M (2020). Forming digital identities in social networks: The role of privacy concerns and self-esteem. Information and Computer Security, 28(4), 589-605. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-01-2020-0003
Twenge (2017). IGen: why Today´s super connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy – and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. Atria Books
Watzlawick, P,.Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. Norton.
We Are Social & Kepios. (2024). Digital 2024: Ecuador. Branch. https://branch.com.co/marketing-digital/situacion-digital-de-ecuador-en-2024/

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ariana Estefanía Garzón Cipriani, Cynthia Shakira Enríquez Fierro