Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Pierre Bourdieu is known as one of the most important sociologists of the last century. The appropriation of the work by different areas of knowledge and the use of theory in various researches have provided a myriad of publications of all kinds. The risk of the proliferation of publications is that of canonizing or despising the author. In order not to fall on one side or the other, Loïc Wacquant proposes mimesis as an antidote. Mimesis is understood as an active process that can either expand or transform the referential to which it is linked. Based on Wacquant's position, the purpose of this article is to understand the Bourdieusian modus operandi. To this end, the main points of the author's social trajectory are contextualized in a way that offers a view of the elements that allowed him to build his own theory. Appreciating the modus operandi attracts an understanding of the notion of author and reader in order to make some considerations about the challenges that the researcher and researcher of the work face in hazy academic times. The study is presented in the form of a bibliographical research, whose essayistic tone comes from the philosophical position from which it originates.
References
Antoine-Mahut, D., & Lézé, S. (Orgs.). (2017). Les classiques à l´épreuve, actualité de l’histoire de la philosophie. Editions des Archives Contemporaines.
Baring, E. (2011). The young Derrida and French philosophy, 1945-1968. Cambridge University Press.
Berlattol, F., Borges, V.P. & Grill, I. (2020). Apresentação. BIB, (93), 1-4.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). Coisas Ditas. (C. R. da Silveira & D. M. Pegorim, Trad.). Editora Brasiliense.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). Qu’est-ce que faire parler un auteur? À propôs de Michel Foucault. Sociétés & Représentations, (3), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.3917/sr.003.0013
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Méditations pascaliennes. Éditions du Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Á contre-pente. Entretien avec Pierre Bourdieu. Vacarme, (14).
https://doi.org/10.3917/vaca.014.0004
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Entrevista. In P. Bourdieu, Pierre Bourdieu entrevistado por Maria Andréa Loyola. (pp. 13–56). EdUERJ.
Bourdieu, P. (2004) Esquisse pour une auto-analyse. Raison d’Agir.
Bourdieu, P., Schultheis, F. & Pfeuffer, A. (2011) With Weber against Weber: Conversation with Pierre Bourdieu. (Translate by Simon Susen). In S. Susen, & B. S. Turner. The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays (pp. 111–124). Anthem Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2015a). Secouez un peu vos structures! In P. Dubois, Y. Durand, & Y. Winkin (Orgs.), Le Symbolique et le social. La réception international de la pensée de Pierre Bourdieu. (pp. 343–359). Press Universitaires de Liège.
Bourdieu, P. (2015b). Sociologie Générale. Cours au Collège de France 1981-1983. Seuil/Raison d’agir.
Bourdieu, P. (2016). Sociologie Générale. Cours au Collège de France 1983-1986. (Vol.2). Seuil/Raison d’agir.
Bonnewitz, P. (2006). La sociología de Pierre Bourdieu. Nueva Visión.
Campos, L. A., & Szwasko, J. (2020). Biblioteca bourdieusiana ou como as ciências brasileiras vêm se apropriando de Pierre Bourdieu (1999-2018). BIB, (91), 1-25. https://doi.org/ 10.17666/bib9108/2020
Catani, A. M., Catani, D. B., & Pereira, G. R. M. (2001). As apropriações da obra de Pierre Bourdieu no campo educacional brasileiro através de periódicos da área. Rev. Brasileira de Educação, (17), 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782001000200006
Dortier, J-F. (2008). Les idées pures n’exitent pas. In: L.-J. Calvet, R. Chartier, P. Corcuff, M. Fournier, N. Heinich, B. Lahire, J-C. Marcel, O. Martin, X. Molénat, L. Mucchielli, F.d. Singly, A. Touraine, V. Troger, & D.Wolton, Pierre Bourdieu. Son oeuvre, son héritage. (pp. 7-16). Sciences Humaines Éditions.
Dosse, F. (1993). Historia do Estruturalismo: O campo do signo, 1945-1966. (A. Cabral, Trad.; v.1). Editora da UNICAMP.
Folscheid, D., & Wunwnburger, J-J. (2006). Metodologia filósofica. (P. Neves, Trad.). Martins Fontes.
Grenfell, M. J. (2004). Pierre Bourdieu: Agent Provocateur. Continuum.
Joly, M. (2015). Excellence sociologique et vocation d’hétérodoxie: Mai 68 et la rupture Aron-Bourdieu. Revue d’histoire des sciences humaines, (26). https://doi.org/10.4000/rhsh.2001
Lescourret, M-A. (2008). Pierre Bourdieu vers une economie du bonheur. Flammarion.
Medeiros, C. C. C. de. (2013). Pierre Bourdieu, dez anos depois. Educar em Revista, (47), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40602013000100017
Ortiz, R. (2013). Nota sobre a recepção de Pierre Bourdieu no Brasil. Sociologia & Antropologia, 3, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752013v353
Patrus, R., Dantas, D. C., & Shigaki, H. B. (2015). O produtivismo acadêmico e seus impactos na pós-graduação stricto sensu: uma ameaça à solidariedade entre pares? Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-39518866
Ricoeur, P. (1994). Tempo e narrativa (tomo I). Papirus.
Schrift, A. D. (2006). Twentieth-Century French Philosophy: Key Themes and Thinkers. Blackwell Publishing.
Silva, J. R. Jr., & Kato, F. G. (2012). PNPG (2011-2020): certificação em massa, internacionalização e mercantilização do conhecimento. In J. R. Jr, Silva; A. M. CATANI, & V. J. CHAVES. Consequências da mundialização da universidade pública brasileira Pós-graduação, trabalho docente, profissionalização e avaliação. (pp. 11–28). Xamã.
Virilio, P. (2005). O espaço crítico e as perspectivas do tempo real. (P. R. Pires, Trad) Editora 34.
Wacquant, L. (2016). Quatre principes transversaux pour mettre Bourdieu au travail (L. Drouet, Trad.). Revue del’Institut de Sociologie, (86), 19–33. http://journals.openedition.org/ris/379
Worms, F. (2009). La philosophie en France au XXe siècle. Moments. Gallimard.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Olga Nancy Peña Cortés