Environmental sustainability for intermediate cities in the Global South
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Metodologías de medición
Ciudades intermedias
Gobernanza inclusiva Measurement methodologies
Urban environmental sustainability
Intermediate cities
Inclusive governance

How to Cite

Yañez, K., Valdovinos, J., & Espinosa, F. (2020). Environmental sustainability for intermediate cities in the Global South. Runas. Journal of Education and Culture, 1(2), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.46652/runas.v1i2.24

Abstract

The ecological footprint of cities is the largest on the planet. Consequently, understanding the scope and limitations of recent methodologies that promote urban environmental sustainability has become increasingly relevant. This article analyzes the implementation process of two methodologies, the ICP (Prosperous City Index) of UN-Habitat and the PCES (Emerging and Sustainable Cities Program) of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) in intermediate cities of the Global South. The text begins by reviewing the major trends that have characterized the urban environmental agenda over the last decades as well as the evolution of the term environmental sustainability. Secondly, it presents the research methodology, based on the participation of the authors in the application of the ICP and the PCES in 6 intermediate cities of Mexico and on a comparative analysis of the scope and results obtained in the different stages of these methodologies. In the development section, three categories to group the successes and areas of opportunity of the ICP and the PCES, are defined: integrated and interrelated diagnoses between various urban dimensions and measurements; comparability between cities and monitoring over time that allow the elaboration of actions/policies at the regional or national levels; and a multi-stakeholder and strategic approach that encourages greater interaction between social, public, and private actors that impact on urban territories. It is concluded that these methodologies will continue to have a limited impact as long as they do not promote both, profound changes towards a plural and inclusive form of governance that reduces power asymmetries as well as paradigm shifts on the interdependent relationships between humans and nature.

https://doi.org/10.46652/runas.v1i2.24
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Berkes, F., Colding, J. & and Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511541957

Berkowitz, M. (2016). Urban Resilience, Inclusion, Medellin, and a Tale of Two Blackouts Videos, 100 Resilient Cities Organisation.

BID (Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo). (6 de diciembre de 2017). El Gobierno de México y el BID invertirán US$13.7 millones para mejorar la capacidad de mitigación y adaptación al cambio climático en tres ciudades del país. https://cutt.ly/ThPkk0X

BID. (2018). Cómo Afectan las Estrategias de Transporte a las Emisiones de GEI. Banco Interamericano. https://cutt.ly/0hPkkkV

Biel, R. (2011). The entropy of Capitalism. Brill P. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004204294

Bobbio, L., Melé, P., & Ugalde, V. (Eds.). (2017). Conflictos y concertación. La gestión de los residuos en México, Italia y Francia. El Colegio de México.

CEPAL. (2018). La economía del cambio climático en América Latina y el Caribe. Una visión gráfica. Naciones Unidas Santiago. https://cutt.ly/ghPkhsn

Constanza, R., & Daly, H. (1992). Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x

Constanza, R., Pickett, K., Trebeck, K., De Vogli, R., et al. (2000). After the crisis: two possible futures. The Solutions Journal, 11(3). https://cutt.ly/RhPkjhW

Daly, H. (2007). Ecological economics and sustainable development: Selected essays of Herman Daly. Edward Elgar.

Delgado, G. C. (Ed.). (2018). Ciudades sensibles al cambio climático: Construyendo capacidades para la sustentabilidad y la resiliencia urbana con equidad. UNAM.

Echavarria, M., Zavala, P., Coronel, L., Montalvo, T., & Aguirre, L. M. (2015). Infraestructura verde en el sector de agua potable en América Latina y el Caribe: Tendencias, retos y oportunidades. Forest Trends, The Nature Conservancy, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation. https://cutt.ly/ihPkfVL

Folke, C. (2016). Resilience (Republished). Ecology and Society. 21(4). 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-09088-210444

Gobierno de México. (2020). Programa Nacional Hídrico 2020-2024. SEMARNAT, CONAGUA. https://cutt.ly/ChPkgpC

Harvey, D. (1996). Cities or urbanization? City, 1(1–2), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604819608900022

Herrera, V. (2017). Water and Politics. Clientelism and Reform in Urban Mexico. University of Michigan Press.

Holling, C. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Journal of Ecosystems. 4(5), 390-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5

James, P. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice. Circles of Sustainability. Routledge.

Kaika, M. (2017). Don’t call me resilient again! the New Urban Agenda as immunology…or…what happens when communities refuse to be vaccinated with ‘smart cities’ and indicators. Environment & Urbanization, 29(1), 89-102 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247816684763

Latour, B. (2018). Cara a cara con el planeta: Siglo XXI.

Latour, B. (2016). Our Sensitivity Arts, Science and Politics in the New Climate Regime. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/692.html

Marcus, L. & Colding, J. (2014). Toward an integrated theory of spatial morphology and resilient urban systems. Ecology and Society, 19(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-06939-190455

Marques, E. (2012). Government, political actors and governance in urban policies in Brazil and Sao Paulo: concepts for a future research agenda. Brazilian Political Science Review. 7(3), 8-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-38212013000300001

McGranahan, G., Schensul, D., & Singh, G. (2016). Inclusive urbanization: Can the 2030 Agenda be delivered without it? Environment and Urbanization, 28(1), 13-34 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815627522

Mas, F., Cortés, F., & Molina, B. (2018). Infraestructuras verdes y azules: Estrategias de adaptación y mitigación ante el cambio climático. Ingeniería Civil, 191, 105–112.

Najmanovich, D. (5 de julio de 2020). En tiempos de pandemia: Potenciar el pensamiento y la vida en común. [Video] Youtube. https://cutt.ly/9hPkfh8

ONU Hábitat. (2016). Cities Prosperity Index. Presentación Interna a Consultores ONU-Hábitat Querétaro, Q500.

Palahí, M., Pantsar, M., Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., et al. (2020). Investing in Nature to Transform the Post COVID-19 Economy: A 10-point Action Plan to create a circular bioeconomy devoted to sustainable wellbeing. The Solutions Journal, 11(2). https://cutt.ly/QhPksoi

Perevochtchikova, M. (2010). La problemática del agua: Revisión de la situación actual desde una perspectiva ambiental. En J. L. Lezama & B. Graizbord (Eds.), Los grandes problemas de México: Vol. IV (pp. 61-104). El Colegio de México.

Plataforma Global por el Derecho a la Ciudad. (2020). Organización comunitaria: Primera línea del hábitat urbano para la respuesta y recuperación de la crisis actual. https://cutt.ly/XhPks19

Pu, B. & Qiu, Y. J. (2016). Emerging trends and new developments on urban resilience: a bibliometric perspective. Current Urban Studies 4, 36-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cus.2016.41004

Purvis, B., Mao, Y. & Robinson, D. (2018). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science. 14, 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5

Quiroz, D. (2018). Implementación de infraestructura verde como estrategia para la mitigación y adaptación al cambio climático en ciudades mexicanas, hoja de ruta. SEDATU, SEMARNAT, GIZ. https://cutt.ly/zhPkdOR

Satterthwaite, D. (2016). Editorial: A new urban agenda? Environment & Urbanisation, 28(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247816637501

Simon, D., Arfvidsson, H., Anand, G., Bazaz, A., et al. (2016). Developing and testing the Urban Sustainable Development Goal’s targets and indicators – a five-city study. Environment and Urbanization, 28(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815619865

Valdovinos, J. (2019). El rol del sector privado en el espacio transnacional del agua: el caso de los grupos franceses Veolia y Suez. En E. Kauffer (Ed.), Las dimensiones políticas de los recursos hídricos: Miradas cruzadas en torno a aguas turbulentas (pp. 171-200). CIESAS.

Valdovinos, J. (Forthcoming 2021). Transnational Corporations in Urban Water Governance: Public-Private Partnerships in Mexico and the U.S. Routledge.

Wolman, A. (1965). Metabolism of cities. https://irows.ucr.edu/cd/courses/10/wolman.pdf

Yañez, K., Ribeiro, M., & Morales, C. (2019). Governance and policy limitations for sustainable urban land planning. The case of Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management. 259, 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109575

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Karol Yañez, Joyce Valdovinos, Fabricio Espinosa

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...