Abstract
This study evaluated the practices of environmental management and corporate responsibility in the management of transformers out of service in the electrical networks of Macas, Ecuador. A quantitative, non-experimental and cross-sectional methodology was used with a census of 29 technicians and administrators from the Macas Electric Company, using a survey with Likert scale questions and review of technical records. The normality tests (Shapiro-Wilk) showed non-normal distributions in all variables (p < 0.05), a high reliability of the Cronbach’s Alpha instrument was demonstrated (?=0.865) and revealed significant correlations between key components of a sustainable management model justifying the use of Spearman correlations. The results showed. that linking traceability through up-to-date inventories, standardized protocols, strategic integration of sustainability and inter-agency coordination positively influences the adoption of environmentally responsible practices. These findings confirm the hypothesis that a sustainable management model strengthens environmental and corporate practices, particularly in resource-constrained contexts. It concludes by proposing a contextualized model that prioritizes the reuse of post-2015 equipment, disposal through reverse auctions and specialized management of transformers with PCBs, contributing to the optimization of resources and reduction of environmental impacts in rural electricity infrastructure.
References
Abogunrin?Olafisoye, O. B., Adeyi, O., Adeyi, A. J., Oke, E. O., & Ojediran, G. O. (2025). Sustainable Waste Electrical and Electronics Equipment Recycling in Nigeria, Policies and Emerging Technologies. Environmental Quality Management, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.70020
Acerbi, F., & Taisch, M. (2020). A literature review on circular economy adoption in the manufacturing sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123086
Bocken, N. M. P., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & Van Der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
Durango Yepes, C. M., & Díaz Pelaez, A. (2025). Revisando la relación entre gobernanza del proyecto y éxito del proyecto: El papel moderador de la gestión del proyecto sostenible y el compromiso de los stakeholders. Revista Científica Pensamiento y Gestión, 56, 111–140. https://doi.org/10.14482/pege.56.457.691
European Commission. Directorate-General for Communication. (2020). Circular economy action plan: For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/05068
Fraga, M. D. S., Reis, G. B., Da Silva, D. D., Guedes, H. A. S., & Elesbon, A. A. A. (2020). Use of multivariate statistical methods to analyze the monitoring of surface water quality in the Doce River basin, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(28), 35303–35318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09783-0
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9168-4
Kalmykova, Y., Sadagopan, M., & Rosado, L. (2018). Circular economy – From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Koltsaklis, N. E., & Knápek, J. (2023). Assessing flexibility options in electricity market clearing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113084
Miller, M. A., Rigg, J., & Taylor, D. (2022). Transboundary environmental governance: Emerging themes and lessons from Southeast Asia. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(4), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2012
Monteiro, H., Carmona-Aparicio, G., Lei, I., & Despeisse, M. (2022). Energy and material efficiency strategies enabled by metal additive manufacturing – A review for the aeronautic and aerospace sectors. Energy Reports, 8, 298–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.035
Moody, C. M., & Townsend, T. G. (2017). A comparison of landfill leachates based on waste composition. Waste Management, 63, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.020
Nieto-Cañarte, C. A., Jiménez-Icaza, M. G., Guamán-Sarango, V. M., & Vélez-Ruiz, M. C. (2024). Gestión sostenible del territorio: Análisis y zonificación agroecológica en una región rural del Ecuador. Ibero-American Journal of Education & Society Research, 4, 161–165. https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v4iS.686
Pereira, A. F. C., & Sousa, J. M. M. (2023). Assisted site-dependent selection of the most suitable Airborne Wind Energy system via Fuzzy Analytic Network Process. Energy Reports, 9, 2881–2899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.045
Rizwan, A., Rasheed, R., Javed, H., Farid, Q., & Ahmad, S. R. (2022). Environmental sustainability and life cycle cost analysis of smart versus conventional energy meters in developing countries. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00464
Silva Barahona, S. P. (2023). La dimensión social de la minería urbana; análisis de los aspectos sociales más relevantes para la gestión de residuos eléctricos y electrónicos (RAEE) en Ecuador [Tesis de maestría, Universidad de Cuenca]. http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/handle/123456789/41427
Yu, K., Qian, C., & Zhang, L. (2021). Understanding sustainable development flexibility: An information perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2173–2183. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2740

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jairo Alejandro Naranjo Sarmiento, Diana Cristina Morales Urrutia, Diego Patricio Cisneros Quintanilla
