Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This research analyzes the communication strategies implemented by Red Ecuatoriana de Mujeres científicas (REMCI) to promote the visibility and representation of women who are involved in science in Ecuador. Through a mixed method approach, that included interviews and surveys, applied to members from different nodes of the network, it was possible to identify effective communicational actions and the challenges that persists in social, academic and media fields. In addition, the study highlights REMCI’s role as a support system that encourages an active participation and cohesion among female researchers and scientists, as well as an agent of chance that contributes to transform gender established preconceptions and creates role models for upcoming generations.
References
Bagur Pons, S., Rosselló Ramon, M. R., Paz Lourido, B., & Verger, S. (2021). El enfoque integrador de la metodología mixta en la investigación educativa. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v27i1.21053
Bayram, H., & Ironside, K. (2021). STEMroller: Smashing stereotypes. JCOM, 20(01). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20010306
Brown Jarreau, P. (2015). Science bloggers’ self-perceived communication roles. JCOM, 14(04). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.14040202
Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645
Castro, L. C. (2018). La acción colectiva feminista, ¿de la lucha de clases a la lucha de géneros? Apuntes para la comprensión/práctica de los movimientos sociales, en torno al caso “Ni Una Menos”. Ciencia Política, 13(26), 19–61. https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v13n26.67977
Corsbie-Massay, C. L. P., & Wheatly, M. G. (2022). The role of media professionals in perpetuating and disrupting stereotypes of women in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. Frontiers in Communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1027502
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dawson, E., Hughes, S., Lock, S. J., & Wahome, M. (2022). Exploring the politics of science communication research: Looking at science communication from a social justice perspective. JCOM, 21(07). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.21070305
Feldman, R. (2023). Women in science: Myth, harsh reality, or advantage. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1247242
Fogg Rogers, L., & Hobbs, L. (2019). Improving visibility of women in science and engineering for both recruitment and retention. Journal of Science Communication, 18(04). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18040305
Gandara, N., & Ramírez Errázuriz, V. (2024). Haciendo ciencia en femenino: Filomena Ramírez y las estrategias de las maestras para producir y divulgar conocimiento en Chile. Asclepio, 76(2). https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2024.27
Halpern, M. K. (2019). Feminist standpoint theory and science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 18(04). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18040302
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill.
Jonsson, A., Brechensbauer, A., & Grafström, M. (2022). Communicating science through competing logics and a science-art lens. JCOM, 21(07). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.21070401
Kvale, S. (2011). Las entrevistas en investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Morata.
Red Ecuatoriana de Mujeres Científicas (REMCI). (2024). Sobre REMCI. https://remci.org/sobre-remci/
Saborit-Rodríguez, A., Morales-Pérez, M., Macola-Ross, D. de la C., & Vera-Aguilera, L. (2022). El sexismo en la historia de las ciencias: Efecto Matilda. Revista Médica Electrónica, 44(4), 758–768.
Satán, N. L., & Rojo Gutiérrez, M. A. (2021). Ciencia y tecnología en Ecuador. Una revisión al estado del arte. Revista Científica UISRAEL, 8(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.35290/rcui.v8n1e.2021.486
Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. (2023). Plan Nacional de la Economía Social de los Conocimientos, Creatividad, Innovación y Saberes Ancestrales (Plan Nacional ESCCISA).
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Väliverronen, E., & Saikkonen, S. (2021). Freedom of expression challenged: Scientists’ perspectives on hidden forms of suppression and self-censorship. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(6), 1172–1200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920978303
Visintini, M. L., & Manassero, L. (2024). Mujeres de la tierra: Voces, saberes y experiencias de América Latina, el Caribe y África. Estudios Rurales, 14(29). https://doi.org/10.48160/22504001er29.537
Wilkinson, C. (2019). What role can Athena SWAN play in gender equality and science communication? Journal of Science Communication, 18(04). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18040306
Wilkinson, C., Milani, E., Ridgway, A., & Weitkamp, E. (2022). Roles, incentives, training and audiences for science communication: Perspectives from female science communicators. JCOM, 21(04). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.21040204
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Abigail Isabel Maldonado Vinueza, Cynthia Shakira Enríquez Fierro